Let Them Sip Champagne: The Battle Of Bolivia

By Anonymous (not verified) , 16 August, 2000
Author
The Konformist

Water is the essence of life, making up 70% of the human body. Mankind can't

live long without it.

Such is the background behind a failed swindle, masterminded by the forces of

globalization. The backlash nearly led to a revolution, the first of

hopefully many to follow in the New World Order of economics. Oddly, there

wasn't too much about it in the news.

Water is the essence of life, making up 70% of the human body. Mankind can't

live long without it.

Such is the background behind a failed swindle, masterminded by the forces of

globalization. The backlash nearly led to a revolution, the first of

hopefully many to follow in the New World Order of economics. Oddly, there

wasn't too much about it in the news.

In 1999, the Bolivian government "privatized" the public water system in the

city of Cochabamba, based on the "advice" (i.e. demands) of the World Bank.

They only considered one bid, by a conglomerate led by Bechtel, the giant

an Francisco-based engineering monolith. Bechtel and its pals were given a

40-year-lease. More than half a million people depend on the water to survive.

What is important to understand is that there's nothing unusual behind such

plans: it's modus operandi for both the IMF and World Bank. "Privatization"

means selling public enterprises and natural resources to private

corporations. The corporations are unsurprisingly almost always Western

military-industrial titans. In exchange, the countries are infused with more

cash. The sales job is that the corporations will run things more efficiently

than a bungling government industry.

It didn't work that way in Bolivia. Big surprise: why would an amoral money

machine not abuse a granted private monopoly and the license to gouge? The

conglomerate doubled and tripled prices. They claimed it was to recover the

cost of a huge dam project in Misicuni, yet to be built. Many impoverished

people suddenly couldn't afford the essence of life. The response from

Bechtel, the Bolivian government, and the World Bank was a collective shrug.

Get used to the new economic realities. Or, as Marie Antoinette would put it,

"Let them sip champagne."

The people of Bolivia responded to the economic rape and thievery with

protests led by workers, environmentalists, and citizen's groups. A strike

and transportation stoppage brought the city to a standstill. They were met

with tear gas and bullets. Six were killed and 175 injured, including two

children blinded from the chemical warfare.

In April 2000, Hugo Banzer, the former Bolivian dictator and now the

President, declared martial law. World Bank Director James Wolfensohn

commented to reporters that, "The riots in Bolivia, I'm happy to say, are now

quieting down." Bechtel issued a statement denying the upheaval in Bolivia

had anything to do with its plundering, and suggested the revolt was the work

of those opposed to a "crackdown on coca-leaf production."

But the tide had turned. This time, the opponents of Corporatism (under the

banner of "free trade globalization") ended in victory against the evil

empire. While Bechtel and the Bolivian government tried to shift blame to the

other, the industrial giant fled its offices and tried to extract a US$12

million exit payment. The leader of the water protests, Oscar Olivera became

a national hero.

More than even Seattle or D.C., the Battle of Bolivia is a global wakeup

call against economic oppression in the world.

Research by Robert Sterling

robalini@aol.com

Let me know if you'd like more info on how the media ignored the story.